
A new study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance reveals that 31% of Ethereum node activity is hosted in the United States. Around 39% is located across the European Union, excluding the UK. The findings show that Ethereum remains largely concentrated in Western regions, although no single country dominates the network.
Research lead Alexander Neumuller said Ethereum’s node distribution is geographically diverse but still heavily centered in North America and Europe. This balance reduces dependence on one country, yet regional concentration remains a key issue for the blockchain ecosystem.
Ethereum’s network can face disruption if more than one-third of validators go offline at the same time. In that situation, checkpoints stop finalizing, reducing network reliability until enough validators return.
Researchers also noted that node operators are heavily concentrated on major cloud providers, including Hetzner, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and OVH. This increases the risk of service outages affecting a large portion of the network.
The report also highlights legal concerns. In 2022, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) argued that Ethereum transactions could fall under U.S. jurisdiction because many nodes were hosted in the country.
Although Neumuller described the current distribution as generally healthy, he emphasized that the Ethereum community should continue monitoring geographic and infrastructure concentration.
The research also warns about software concentration. If a widely used Ethereum client contains a critical bug, the issue could spread quickly across the network. Maintaining diversity among both consensus and execution clients helps strengthen Ethereum’s resilience.
The report updates Cambridge’s post-Merge energy analysis using real-world hosting data. Ethereum now consumes about 7.9 gigawatt-hours of electricity per year, representing a 99.98% reduction compared to its pre-Merge energy usage.
Researchers estimate that more than 56% of the network now operates on sustainable energy, exceeding the current global average. They also found that offsetting Ethereum’s annual carbon emissions would cost roughly $33,500 to $73,800, making its environmental impact relatively small compared to many traditional industries.
The Cambridge study suggests Ethereum has made significant progress in energy efficiency. However, the concentration of nodes in specific regions and cloud providers remains an important challenge. Improving geographic and infrastructure diversity will help strengthen Ethereum’s decentralization and long-term network security.
