The lines between politics and the bitcoin industry have once again blurred in the US. Tron inventor Justin Sun reportedly received a private meal with President Donald Trump after investing $18.6 million in TRUMP coin. This meeting took place a few days after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) temporarily halted a fraud case it had brought against Sun. Sun’s involvement in this event brought up ethical issues and rekindled debates about the role of government influence in cryptocurrency investments.
Justin Sun said on social media that he was honored to have the chance to have dinner with Trump and that he wanted to support the president while also talking about the future of the cryptocurrency sector. Sun’s presence, however, raised serious ethical questions in the public and regulatory spheres and was not only a matter of pride.
The monitoring organization Accountable raised concerns about the potential use of these events as tools for political influence.America. Tony Carrk, the organization’s leader, argued that the competitive environment of the TRUMP cryptocurrency provided foreign organizations with a means of exerting pressure on the US. President. Carrk claims that this instance demonstrates how cryptocurrencies have grown to be crucial in the political sphere. Through the distribution of public monies and the formulation of public policy, such partnerships motivated by shared interests have the potential to upset the democratic system’s equilibrium.
Before the House of Representatives Budget Committee, Paul Atkins, the chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, responded to inquiries on the issue. According to Atkins, cryptocurrencies as they currently exist are considered “collectibles” and are exempt from current securities regulations. He did, however, agree that regulation was necessary and stated that he would be obtaining public input to create a new framework.
These claims demonstrate that the SEC has not yet provided a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. Given the market’s quick changes and investments entwined with political ties, the Commission’s cautious approach is insufficient. This circumstance has angered lawmakers like Glenn Ivey, who has harshly criticized TRUMP’s investments established through family connections and the quick sale of cryptocurrency.
These developments show that bitcoin markets are being used as political tools of power in addition to being used as economic tools. The public believes that the system is moving away from its transparent roots due to a number of factors, including the absence of monitoring, moral dilemmas, and the impact of foreign money.
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.
