Scams Radar

Why TradFi Giants Like BlackRock Are Buying DeFi Tokens Now

BlackRock logo representing institutional interest in buying DeFi tokens and expanding into decentralized finance

In early February 2026, several major traditional finance (TradFi) institutions made headlines by acquiring DeFi governance tokens — a move that was rare until recently.

  • BlackRock brought its tokenized Treasury fund BUIDL onchain via UniswapX and purchased UNI tokens.
  • Citadel Securities supported the launch of LayerZero’s “Zero” blockchain and acquired ZRO tokens.
  • Apollo Global Management (or affiliates) signed a cooperation agreement to acquire up to 90 million MORPHO tokens (≈9% of supply) over 48 months.

These purchases mark a departure from earlier patterns where large firms limited crypto exposure to equity stakes, venture rounds, or pilot programs.

Strategic Infrastructure Access, Not Speculative Bets

Most investors and analysts agree: these moves are not broad portfolio allocations into DeFi tokens as a new asset class.

  • They are vendor alignment and product strategy plays.
  • Each firm bought tokens in the specific protocol they plan to use as infrastructure.

“Each firm bought tokens in the specific protocol they intend to use as infrastructure. This is vendor alignment, not portfolio allocation.” — Jake Brukhman, CoinFund

TradFi institutions are increasingly tokenizing their own products (e.g., Treasuries, funds, credit) and distributing them onchain. To do that effectively, they need reliable DeFi venues — and holding governance tokens creates alignment, brand halo, and sometimes better access or influence.

“They are selling to us, not buying from us. TradFi firms are the factory and crypto is the store.” — Lex Sokolin, Generative Ventures

What Changed? Infrastructure & Regulatory Tailwinds

Nothing fundamental about DeFi protocols changed overnight. What improved significantly is the operational and regulatory environment:

  • Custody & tooling: Enterprise-grade custody, MPC wallets, governance controls, and compliance tooling have matured substantially in the last 12–24 months.
  • Regulatory clarity:
    • Repeal of SAB 121 (early 2025) removed punitive accounting treatment for crypto custody.
    • SEC closed investigations into Uniswap, Coinbase, Aave without enforcement.
    • GENIUS Act created a federal stablecoin framework.
    • SEC Project Crypto introduced a four-tier token taxonomy signaling most governance tokens are not securities.
    • Anticipated passage of the CLARITY Act (market structure bill) is viewed as a major tailwind.

These developments lowered the compliance and operational friction that previously made direct token ownership difficult for regulated institutions.

Structural Shift or Strategic Positioning?

Opinions vary:

  • Structural shift camp (e.g., Richard Galvin, Digital Asset Capital Management): Firms of this scale do not deploy capital casually — internal governance, risk, and compliance hurdles are high. These are deliberate strategic decisions.
  • Middle ground (e.g., Anirudh Pai, Robot Ventures): Allocations are still small relative to AUM; premature to call it structural until tokens become meaningful portfolio components.
  • Mostly symbolic/strategic camp: The purchases are largely about distribution strategy and brand alignment, not deep conviction in governance token economics.

Governance Tokens vs. Strategic Equity

Most investors say governance tokens do not yet function like strategic equity:

  • No legal claim on assets
  • No fiduciary duty
  • Rights are often soft/social rather than contractual
  • Governance can be messy (e.g., Aave debates)

For tokens to behave more like equity, we need:

  • Clear fee switches and value accrual mechanisms
  • Reduced VC unlock pressure
  • Stronger legal enforceability
  • Regulatory clarity (especially post-CLARITY Act)

Many expect novel token designs that look more like onchain equity once market structure legislation passes.

Why Token Prices Didn’t Move Much

Despite the news, DeFi token prices barely budged.

Reasons:

  • Announcements landed in a weak market with depressed risk appetite.
  • Token economics didn’t change overnight — no immediate fee switch, revenue share, or unlock reduction.
  • Sophisticated holders wait for durable cash-flow linkage before reacting.

DeFi tokens have historically underperformed protocol revenue/TVL due to:

  • Little/no revenue capture to token holders
  • Persistent VC sell pressure
  • L1/L2 fragmentation diluting value capture

Governance Capture Risks & What Could Go Wrong

Concentration of power is a legitimate concern:

  • Institutions vote at higher rates than retail DAO participants (who often sit in single digits).
  • Professional participation could improve discipline — or lead to centralized control.

Biggest risk: Regulatory reversal

  • A future SEC chair could reclassify revenue-sharing tokens as securities.
  • CLARITY Act has not yet passed (though considered very likely).

Who’s Next? Where’s the Activity Headed?

Most expect more TradFi firms to buy selectively, focusing on blue-chip protocols tied to their product strategy.

Frequently mentioned names:

  • Protocols: Aave, Maple Finance, Sky, Ethena, EtherFi, Uniswap
  • Potential buyers: Fidelity, Franklin Templeton, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, BNY Mellon, Morgan Stanley, State Street, Visa, Cantor Fitzgerald, Janus Henderson

Most moves will likely remain tied to strategic relationships rather than pure speculation — at least until clearer value accrual and regulatory treatment emerge.

Bottom Line

TradFi’s direct purchases of DeFi governance tokens are real — but they are primarily strategic infrastructure plays, not broad bets on DeFi tokens as an asset class. Improved custody, regulatory tailwinds, and maturing infrastructure have lowered the barriers enough for deliberate, selective exposure. The long-term direction points toward more institutional participation, clearer value accrual mechanisms, and potentially novel token designs resembling onchain equity — but we’re still early in that transition.

Reviews:

Leave Your Review Here:

Scams Radar disclaimer highlighting educational purpose, no financial guarantees, risk warnings, and independent opinions.