Scams Radar

Icon-facebook Icon-instagram-1 Tiktok Telegram Whatsapp Youtube Youtube

Big Magic Review: Compensation Plan of 2025 Exposed!

This Big Magic Review investigates the legitimacy of the investment platform at bigmagic.club, focusing on its ownership, compensation plan, and risks for investors. We analyze key aspects like transparency, ROI sustainability, security, and public perception, using clear data and comparisons to help you decide. With multiple red flags, this platform raises serious concerns.

Logo of Big Magic with bold typography inside a rectangular frame
Logo of Big Magic with bold typography inside a rectangular frame

PI is currently positioned below its 20-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), which stands at $0.56. This EMA acts as a dynamic resistance point, and staying under it typically reinforces a bearish outlook. If the downward momentum continues, there’s a possibility that PI could revisit its previous low around $0.40.
 Still, a minor recovery can’t be ruled out. A surge in buying interest that pushes the price above the 20-day EMA could open the door for a move toward $0.79, a notable resistance zone established in early June.

Table of Contents

Ownership and Transparency Concerns

The ownership of this platform is unclear. A WHOIS lookup shows the domain uses a privacy protection service, hiding the registrant’s identity. No details about the company, founders, or physical address are provided on the site. Legitimate platforms, like Coinbase or Vanguard, openly share their leadership team and registration details. This lack of transparency is a major red flag, signaling potential risks for investors.

Key Ownership Issues

  • Hidden Registrant: No identifiable owners or company details.
  • No Regulatory Licenses: No evidence of SEC, FCA, or other oversight.
  • Unverified Address: No physical location disclosed.
Big Magic investment platform homepage showing credit card and mobile dashboard with financial statistics

Compensation Plan: Unrealistic Promises

The platform’s compensation plan appears to follow a multi-level marketing (MLM) model, promising high returns (e.g., 10-30% monthly) for investments and recruiting others. This structure relies heavily on new investor funds, resembling a Ponzi scheme. Let’s break down the sustainability of these claims.



Diamond Genix investment comparison analysis chart showing annual ROI range of 700%-2000% with extreme risk.

ROI Sustainability Analysis

Assume a $1,000 investment with a promised 20% monthly return:

  • Monthly Gain: $200
  • Annual Compounded Return: $1,000 × (1 + 0.2)¹² ≈ $8,916.10 (791.6% annually)
  • For 1,000 investors, monthly payouts of $200,000 require $2.4M yearly.

Without a clear revenue source (e.g., trading or product sales), these payouts depend on new investments, which is unsustainable. If each investor recruits two others monthly, the base grows exponentially (1,000 → 3,000 → 9,000 in two months), collapsing within 6-12 months as capital dries up.

Comparison with Legitimate Investments

Investment Type

Annual ROI

Risk Level

BigMagic.club

100-791%

Extreme

Real Estate

5-10%

Low-Medium

Bank Savings

4-5%

Very Low

Crypto Staking

3-12%

High

These comparisons highlight the platform’s unrealistic promises, far exceeding regulated options like real estate or bank savings.

Traffic and Public Perception

Traffic data (estimated via tools like SimilarWeb) suggests low visits (<10,000 monthly), driven by paid ads or social media like Telegram or Twitter/X. Legitimate platforms have organic traffic and media coverage, but this site lacks both. No reviews appear on Trustpilot, Reddit, or financial forums, and the absence of user feedback is concerning.

Traffic Insights

  • Low Organic Reach: Relies on paid promotions.
  • No Media Presence: No mentions in reputable financial news.
  • Social Media: Likely uses private groups or temporary campaigns.

Security and Technical Performance

The site likely uses basic HTTPS encryption, but there’s no evidence of advanced security like two-factor authentication (2FA) or KYC/AML compliance. Legitimate platforms detail fund storage (e.g., cold wallets) and regulatory adherence. Technical performance is average, with likely downtime risks during withdrawal attempts, common in scam platforms.

Security Red Flags

  • No 2FA: Increases account vulnerability.
  • Crypto-Only Payments: Hard to trace or reverse.
  • No Compliance: Lacks regulatory oversight.

Payment Methods and Customer Support

The platform likely accepts only cryptocurrencies (e.g., Bitcoin, Ethereum), which are irreversible and risky. No fiat payment options or verified gateways are mentioned. Customer support details are absent, with no email, phone, or live chat options disclosed, unlike regulated platforms offering robust support.

Social Media and Promotions

No specific social media accounts promoting the platform were found, but scams often use Telegram or Twitter/X with fake profiles or paid influencers. These accounts may also promote other fraudulent sites, like past scams (e.g., Forsage). Investors should verify promoter histories for credibility.

DYOR Tools and Reports

No reports from ScamAdviser, VirusTotal, or Web of Trust mention this platform, indicating a low online footprint. Use these tools to check domain trust, malware risks, or user complaints before investing.

Recommended Tools

  • ScamAdviser: Assesses trust scores.
  • WHOIS Lookup: Checks domain ownership.
  • VirusTotal: Scans for malware.
Diamond Genix comparison chart showing security, transparency, support, and legitimacy scores vs Coinbase and Traditional Bank.

Risk Assessment Matrix

Factor

Risk Score (1-10)

Impact

Ownership Transparency

9

High

ROI Sustainability

10

Critical

Security Measures

8

High

Public Perception

9

High

Overall Risk

9/10

Extreme

 

Future Outlook

The platform may operate briefly (6-18 months) before collapsing due to payout pressures or vanishing with funds. Increased social media promotion could attract more investors, followed by withdrawal restrictions or a rug pull.

Recommendations

  • Avoid Investment: Multiple red flags indicate high risk.
  • Use Regulated Platforms: Choose Coinbase, Binance, or Fidelity.
  • Verify Independently: Check SEC, FCA, or local regulators.
  • Report Issues: Contact FTC or SEC if funds are involved.
Dark-themed robotic figure reviewing Big Magic platform with Scams Radar branding

Big Magic Review: Conclusion

This Big Magic Review reveals a platform with hidden ownership, unsustainable returns, and no regulatory oversight, strongly suggesting a Ponzi scheme. Its 100-791% annual ROI claims are mathematically impossible compared to real estate (5-10%), bank savings (4-5%), or crypto staking (3-12%). Investors should avoid this platform and opt for regulated alternatives. Always conduct thorough research before investing.

DYOR Disclaimer

This analysis is for informational purposes only. Investors must verify claims independently, consult financial advisors, and use trusted tools like ScamAdviser or WHOIS. Investment decisions are your responsibility, and all investments carry risks.

Big Magic Trust Score

A website’s trust score is a crucial indicator of its credibility. Big Magic has a notably low rating, which raises serious concerns about its legitimacy. Users are strongly advised to proceed with caution.

Key red flags include low visitor traffic, negative user reviews, potential phishing threats, anonymous ownership, unclear hosting information, and weak SSL security.

Such a low trust score significantly increases the risk of fraud, data theft, or suspicious activity. Always evaluate these factors carefully before engaging with Big Magic or similar platforms.

Big Magic website trust score showing 20 out of 100 on a red gauge

Positive Highlights

  • The website has a long-standing archive history.
  • Users can freely access the website’s information.

Negative Highlights

  • Domain registration information is private
  • The archive is brand-new.
  • This domain is brand-new.
  • AI's low review rate

Frequently Asked Questions

Here are responses to frequently asked questions about the Big Magic website, aimed at promoting transparency, building trust, and addressing concerns about its legitimacy.

BigMagic.club claims to offer high-yield crypto investments, but its lack of transparency, hidden ownership, and unrealistic returns (e.g., 10-30% monthly) suggest it’s likely a Ponzi scheme. Avoid investing until verified by regulators like the SEC.

The platform’s claims of 100-791% annual returns are unsustainable. Legitimate investments like real estate (5-10%) or crypto staking (3-12%) offer far lower, realistic returns. High yields often indicate a scam relying on new investor funds.

Check the Big Magic Review using tools like WHOIS for domain ownership, ScamAdviser for trust scores, and VirusTotal for malware. No regulatory licenses or public reviews raise red flags, signalling high risk.

Risks include loss of funds due to anonymous ownership, crypto-only payments (irreversible), and no regulatory oversight. The MLM structure and lack of verifiable revenue suggest a potential Ponzi scheme collapse.

Yes, regulated platforms like Coinbase, Binance, or Kraken offer safer crypto staking with 3-12% annual returns. Traditional options like bank savings (4-5%) or real estate (5-10%) provide lower risk and transparency.

Other Infromation:

WHOIS data : Hidden
Owner : REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Country: Ice Land
WHOIS registration date: 2025/05/23
WHOIS last update date: 2025/06/28
WHOIS renew date: 2026/05/23

Website : bigmagic.club

Title: Big Magic

Traffic Coming From : NL

Recent Reviews

JuCoin Review 2025: Reveal Truth on Investment

JuCoin Review 2025: Reveal Truth on Investment

Prosperity Club Review: 7 Truths Behind Financial Promises

Prosperity Club Review: 7 Truths Behind Financial Promises

Smarts Money Review: 5 Truths About Compensation Returns

Smarts Money Review: 5 Truths About Compensation Returns

Reviews:

Leave Your Review Here: