
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) recently published its Annual Economic Report 2026. The report strongly argues that stablecoins do not qualify as true money. The BIS evaluated dollar-pegged tokens against key monetary standards. These standards include singleness, elasticity, interoperability, and integrity. According to the authors, current stablecoin designs fail on all these fronts.
Stablecoin prices often drift away from their intended pegs on secondary markets. Redeeming these tokens also involves unnecessary friction. Because of this, the report argues that stablecoins act more like exchange-traded funds (ETFs) than actual payment methods. BIS General Manager Pablo Hernández de Cos made similar remarks earlier this year. Currently, the total stablecoin market value is around $320 billion. Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) make up the vast majority of this supply.
The BIS also analyzed the potential economic impact of widespread stablecoin adoption. Even if market values hit $1 trillion to $3 trillion, the net effect on economic output would be slightly negative. Higher bank funding costs and weaker lending would outweigh any fiscal benefits. Furthermore, stablecoins facilitate illicit on-chain activity due to permissionless blockchains. The report also warned about “stablecoin dollarization” in emerging markets. This trend could erode local monetary sovereignty and disrupt global capital flows.
The BIS proposed a safer alternative for the future of digital money. The organization suggests bringing tokenization into the existing two-tier banking system. The centerpiece of this vision is a “unified ledger.” This shared platform would safely integrate tokenized central bank reserves and commercial bank money. Central bank money would serve as the ultimate trusted anchor. The BIS pointed to Project Agora, a cross-border payments prototype, as proof that this model can successfully work.
