Send It Academy Review: Legit Opportunity or Risky Venture?
Send It Academy, launched in early 2024, promotes a letter-writing program to earn money by contacting casinos for sweepstakes coins, alongside affiliate marketing and e-commerce training. This Send It Academy review on ScamsRadar examines its legitimacy, focusing on ownership, compensation plan, and risks. We use clear language, charts, and bullet points to help everyday readers decide if SendIt.Academy is a viable side hustle or a risky scheme.
Table of Contents
Ownership and Transparency
The platform’s ownership raises concerns. WHOIS records show the domain, registered on February 18, 2024, via NameSilo, LLC, uses privacy protection to hide registrant details. A Nevada Secretary of State filing confirms Send It Academy as a registered entity, but its short history (less than a year) limits credibility. No verifiable information about founders or team members is disclosed, unlike legitimate platforms that share professional backgrounds. Reddit mentions a founder posting repetitive “winnings” screenshots, but no name or credentials are provided, signaling potential accountability issues.
Compensation Plan Breakdown
Send It Academy’s business model centers on a Paid Per Letter (PPL) program, with additional affiliate and e-commerce components. Users pay $199.99 upfront and $25 monthly for training and a private Facebook community. Key features include:
- Letter-Writing: Write letters to casinos for sweeps coins ($3–$5 each), convertible to cash after gambling requirements.
- Affiliate Program: Pay $20 to earn $100 per referral, available in restricted states (Idaho, Washington, Michigan, Quebec).
- E-Commerce and Cashback: Learn online sales and use a cashback app for extra income.
The plan incentivizes recruitment, resembling multi-level marketing (MLM). Claims of $50–$75/hour (12–15 letters/hour at $5 each) are optimistic. Realistic earnings, factoring in rejections and costs (stamps, supplies), are closer to $15–$20/hour, with a 3–6-month wait for payouts.x
Sustainability Analysis
The reliance on recruitment signals a pyramid-like model. To sustain $3,000 weekly payouts for 100 investor
Assume a user invests $199.99 plus $25 monthly ($300 annually) and earns $500 yearly (optimistic). The ROI is:
- Annual Profit: $500 – $300 = $200
- ROI: ($200 / $300) × 100 = 66.67%
Costs include stamps ($0.68 × 28 letters × 30 days = $571.20) and supplies ($50/month), totaling $646 monthly. To break even, users need 129 successful letters ($646 ÷ $5), or 4.3 daily, assuming no rejections. Casino oversaturation and declining acceptance rates make this unsustainable, requiring constant recruitment.
Year | Users | New Users Needed |
1 | 100 | 167 |
2 | 167 | 278 |
3 | 278 | 463 |
s, the platform needs $300,000 weekly in new funds (600 new $500 investors). This exponential growth is unsustainable, as shown below:
ROI Comparison
The claimed 66.67% ROI exceeds traditional investments:
- Real Estate: 6–10% annually, stable.
- Bank Savings: 4–5% APY, FDIC-insured.
- Crypto Staking: 2–6% APY (e.g., Coinbase).
Send It Academy: Up to 66.67%, unreliable.
Traffic Trends and Public Perception
Sendit.academy has a high Tranco score but low organic traffic, suggesting paid or affiliate-driven visits. The domain expires in January 2025, indicating short-term intent. Trustpilot shows a 4-star rating from 39 reviews, praising training but noting billing issues and no earnings for some. Reddit’s r/antiMLM labels it a scam, citing a serial scammer founder and recycled screenshots. ScamAdviser (June 2025) gives a high trust score but warns of hidden ownership. The Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council flagged misleading claims like “$4,000/month,” requiring their removal.
Security and Technical Performance
The platform uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate but lacks details on two-factor authentication or audits. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and offers an app, but JavaScript reliance may hide content. No server uptime data is available, and the short domain life raises reliability concerns.
Payment Methods and Support
Payments include a $199.99 fee and $25 monthly via credit card or PayPal. Non-refundable transactions and reported unauthorized charges are red flags. Support includes a Nevada phone number (800-213-2145), email (support@paidperletters.com), and live chat, but inconsistent responses are noted.
Content Authenticity
Content focuses on letter-writing and affiliate strategies but mirrors free YouTube tutorials, reducing value. Claims of easy earnings lack evidence, and casino oversaturation undermines viability.
Social Media and Promoters
Promoters like “Anthony Lifestyle” (YouTube) and Telegram’s “Affiliate Money Makers” push the platform, also linked to SkyMining.network, iHub.Meta, and UTOPIAFlow.org, suggesting a history of questionable ventures. No verified profiles were found, indicating transient promotion.
Red Flags
- Hidden ownership via privacy protection.
- MLM structure prioritizing recruitment.
- Unrealistic 66.67% ROI claims.
- Non-refundable fees and billing issues.
- Short domain life (expires 2025).
- Misleading earnings claims flagged by DSSRC.
DYOR Tool Reports
- ScamAdviser (June 2025): High trust but warns of newness and hidden ownership.
- Scam Detector (June 2024): Labels it a potential façade due to MLM traits.
- Trustpilot (June 2025): 4-star rating, but negative reviews highlight no earnings.
- Gridinsoft (2025): 31/100, flags affiliate-heavy redirects.
DYOR Tools
- ScamAdviser: Checks website trust.
- Gridinsoft: Assesses malware risks.
- Scamdoc: Evaluates platform legitimacy.
- WHOIS Lookup: Reveals domain details.
- SimilarWeb: Tracks traffic trends.
Future Predictions
The MLM model and casino reliance suggest a 6–12-month lifespan. Regulatory scrutiny from the FTC, as seen with LuLaRoe, could halt operations. Market saturation will reduce payouts, risking an exit scam.
Recommendations
- Avoid Joining: High risks outweigh uncertain rewards.
- Research Thoroughly: Use ScamAdviser, Trustpilot, and Reddit.
- Choose Alternatives: Freelancing (Upwork, $15–$50/hour) or index funds (7–10% ROI).
- Verify Promoters: Check YouTube and Telegram claims.
- Consult Advisors: Seek licensed financial guidance.
Send It Academy Review Conclusion
This Send It Academy review reveals a risky platform with hidden ownership and an unsustainable MLM model. Its 66.67% ROI claim dwarfs real estate (6–10%), bank savings (4–5%), and crypto staking (2–6%), but casino oversaturation and billing issues signal fraud risks. Similar red flags are evident in the TEXITcoin Review, which also exposes exaggerated ROI and a deceptive model. Avoid this program and prioritize regulated, transparent opportunities.
Send It Academy Review Trust Score
A website’s trust score plays a vital role in evaluating its credibility, and Send It Academy shows a dangerously low rating—raising serious concerns about its legitimacy. Users are strongly advised to proceed with caution.
The platform presents several warning signs, including low traffic, poor user reviews, potential phishing threats, hidden ownership, unclear hosting information, and weak SSL security.
Given this low trust score, the chances of fraud, data breaches, or other harmful activity increase significantly. It’s essential to assess these red flags carefully before engaging with Send It Academy or similar platforms.
Let me know the next company name whenever you want a swap.
Positive Highlights
- Top 1M globally
Negative Highlights
- Content: Not accessible
- AI Reviews: Low
- Domain Age: New
- Archive Data: Recently created
- WHOIS Info: Hidden
Frequently Asked Questions About Send It Academy Review
This section answers key questions about , providing clarity, promoting trust, and addressing concerns regarding the platform’s legitimacy.
Not likely. The platform charges high fees for information freely available online, and its earnings model relies on casino gift redemptions that are not guaranteed.
Unrealistic. While they claim $5 per letter, actual payouts are inconsistent, limited by casino policies, and often result in far lower returns.
No. Casinos are actively reducing rewards and rejecting submissions. As more people join, earnings shrink, making the model unsustainable.
There’s no evidence of protection. Multiple users report unauthorized charges, sudden deactivations, and zero support response after payment.
Because the program promotes inflated income claims, lacks ownership transparency, and users feel misled after paying hundreds for common knowledge.
Other Infromation:
Reviews:
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.